SRT Bulletin No.
32 - February 2004
Society, Religion and Technology Project
Church of Scotland
Contents
Download this newsletter as a Word file
SRT Associate’s Conference Climate change is unjust. It affects poor
nations much worse than our own. What would be a just and equitable solution? How
can nations with vastly different economies, political structures, histories
and value systems come to an agreement in time to avert the worst impacts? What
is a distinctive Christian voice on this issue and what part should it play in
a process that involves people from every tribe and tongue? These were challenges posed by Dr John Turnpenny of the Tyndall Centre for Climate
Change Research to delegates at the SRT Associates Conference on 31st
January. The SRT Associates Scheme was set up to help those with an interest in
our work to become more involved. The conference formed part of our ongoing
commitment to keep Associates up to date on issues, to hear their views, and explore
ways in which they can engage with SRT’s ongoing work. Dr Jeff Maxwell, former
head of the Macaulay Land Use Institute, also addressed the gathering, giving stimulating
insights into last year’s national debate on GM crops. Both debates are driven
by basic values - our views about life, nature and intervention, justice and
risk, and about who makes the decisions. They call for a clear Christian response.
We are greatly encouraged by our Associates’ commitment
to engaging with these issues and to generating discussion in their own
constituencies. This extends SRT’s twin tasks of mission and congregational
resourcing. Copies of the speakers' presentations and a report of the conference
will be available shortly. Dr Noranne Ellis, Scottish Natural Heritage
Tickets £6/£4 on the door. Book by phone 0131-473 2070; by post: Science Festival Box Office, The Hub, Castle Hill, Ed-inburgh EH1 2ME; or call at The Hub
Cloned Human Embryos: the Ethics SRT Director Dr Bruce was present
at the American scientific conference in The Koreans’ eventual aim is
so-called therapeutic cloning. To treat patients suffering from a wide range of
degenerative diseases, stem cells would be taken from embryos cloned from
patients’ own cells. These would be turned into replacement body cells that are
genetically matched to the patient, reducing the risk of rejection compared
with cells from IVF embryos. But in practice therapeutic cloning seems an unrealistic
prospect, except maybe as a technology for the rich. To create cloned embryos
for all potential patients would be too expensive and need impracticably large
numbers of human eggs. Clinical use would
probably rely on cells taken from IVF embryos or from adult tissue. Therapeutic
cloning is also controversial ethically. It would create and use human embryos
which would then be destroyed, and many see it as a ‘slippery slope’ to making
cloned babies.
So are cloned embryos justified? The
2001 General Assembly did not completely exclude this, but the main use now
seems to be for research into cell processes, not therapy. A House of Lords committee
recommended that cloned embryos should only be
created for research in exceptional cases. The Roslin Institute argues that one
such case is the study of motor neuron disease cells. This needs careful
evaluation whether it would work or if better ways exist to study the disease. If
research on cloned embryos might mean that one day cells could be derived from
adult sources without using embryos, this might be another case for cloning research.
But there is a rub.
The Koreans rightly say this
technology should not be used to make cloned babies, but several maverick scientists
are competing with each other for the notoriety of doing so, regardless of
ethics or risks. A United Nations ban on reproductive human cloning is stalled
by a US plan to
outlaw all forms of cloning, including
uses in medical research. Until we have a global ban on reproductive cloning,
it would seem foolish to allow cloned embryos to be made or used in this or any
other country.
SRT at Large SRT continues to play a key role
in biotechnology debates at home and abroad. In February, Dr Bruce was invited to
represent the ‘unheard’ voice of religion at a conference in SRT Reports for 2004
Assembly This year, SRT will report to the General Assembly
in a new slot for all ‘Church and Society’ issues, on Tuesday 18 May. SRT will
present two special reports. One is an update on whether GM crops should be
grown in the Eco-Congregation Scotland ·
Melrose Parish Church Hall (Borders) Saturday 6 March ·
Kilmore and ·
·
Materials for Creation Sunday 6 June What about celebrating Creation
Sunday in your church? A resource pack to help you will be available in April
from the Christian conservation organisation ‘A Rocha’, 13 Avenue Road, Southall,
New SRT Administrator In January we were delighted to welcome Rev Alan Whitson as the new SRT
Administrator. Alan is a non-stipendiary minister with the Methodist Central
Hall in SRT and Your Needs SRT is the Kirk's mission to the world of
science and technology and an ecumenical resource for churches in The SRT Trust exists to raise funds to help
support SRT’s work. The SRT Associates scheme enables people to be kept more
closely in touch with our work via regular mailings of our reports, papers,
talks, etc. Further details from SRT. SRT is a Church of
Scotland project of the Board of National Mission, a member of Action of
Churches Together in
SRT at Edinburgh Science Festival 2004
Climate Change in Scotland: Adapt, move or die?
Monday April 5, 7:30 - 9:00 p.m.
What will climate change mean for Scotland’s living environment? Will native plants and animals die off or be replaced by exotic southern species? And how far should we go to save our fellow creatures?
Royal Botanic Gardens, Edinburgh
Dr Donald Bruce, SRT Project.
Society Religion and Technology Project, The Cottage, SAC,
Kings Buildings,
Address postal mail to: John
Knox House,
Tel: 0131-240 2250 Fax: 0131-240 2239 Email:
srtp@srtp.org.uk Website : http://www.srtp.org