Director : Dr Donald Bruce
1997 General Assembly Report
BSE and CJD Crisis, and its effect on Scottish agriculture
from the Church and Nation Committee
in consultation with the Society, Religion and Technology Project, Board of National Mission
Accepted by the General Assembly on 22 May 1997
Contents
The 1996 General Assembly instructed the Committee on Church and Nation, in consultation with the Society Religion and Technology Project, to consider how to respond to issues arising out of the BSE crisis and to report to the General Assembly of 1997. The Committee on Church and Nation and the Society Religion and Technology Project have between them consulted with a number of key organisations and individuals, listed at the end of this report. The Public Questions Committee of the Presbytery of Perth also reported on this topic in November ad the Committee was grateful to receive a copy of their report. Given the changing nature of the situation, attention is focused in this relatively brief report on some the more abiding issues which arose from these consultations, rather than the detail of particular policy issues.
When the Health Minister made the fateful announcement on March 20 of the new strain of CJD, and of a possible link between it and BSE, the universal experience of everyone involved was of profound shock. Medical and research teams who had worked for years on spongiform diseases were faced with the fact that what had been only a very remote and improbable scientific risk had apparently happened. Farmers, auctioneers, abattoir workers and agricultural advisors, long used to crises like bad harvests, were faced with the possibility that the largest sector in Scottish agriculture might be wiped out overnight, and their livelihoods with it.
"The recent BSE scare and the resulting consumer and EU reaction amounts to a major disaster for Scottish agriculture."
1. Beef is described as the backbone of Scottish farming, by far the biggest sector, whose UKP 530M represents about 30% of the entire Scottish agricultural output. At every stage of the beef cycle - the upland breeders, the lowland "finishers" who fatten the cattle for slaughter, the auction marts, abattoirs, livestock hauliers and the processing industry - there have been serious losses, sometimes amounting to an entire year's profits, as cattle prices slumped, the market for beef collapsed overnight, and exports were banned.
Substantial compensation has cushioned the blow to most of those most affected in 1996, so that people are not generally in dire
straits. There are very serious concerns for 1997 and beyond for the upland cattle breeders. They are highly vulnerable to the eventual consumer demand and price of beef, and do not have the options for diversification into crops or other livestock which enabled many lowland farmers to buffer the impact. Many of these upland rural areas are already economically fragile. It could have a profound effect of the economy of a region like Orkney, for example, whose grass-fed beef is the islands' main source of income, and much of which used to go for export. It is ironic that their very few cases of BSE all came from stock imported from the south.
There has been a gradual recovery in beef consumption and prices. By January 1997, overall UK beef demand had recovered by about 70%. Prime cuts are nearly back to normal, mince is down a little, but processed beef demand has halved and is unlikely to recover. Prime beef prices are about 10-20% below those before the crisis, but poorer quality beef which used to go for processing is fetching very low prices. Any substantial recovery of the Scottish beef industry will depend, however, on the UK export ban being lifted. In the long term, it is hoped
that Scottish beef could rely on its clean, high quality, grass fed image to capture niche markets, and quality assurance schemes are in place. The future trend in the highly consumer-sensitive parts of the market, like the big supermarket and burger chains, is likely to be towards dedicated groups of beef suppliers attached to one abattoir, with maximum traceability and quality assurance.
Return to Contents
A variety of reactions was reported to the Committee. Naturally, feelings of personal concern are prominent. One farmer said, "You wonder what it is you've been selling, to make folk ill." We also found a sense of indignation at people wagging fingers at farming, when farmers regard a lot of what has happened as having been outwith their control. For a long time feed suppliers kept secret what "proteins" had been added to a bag of feed, and farmers simply had to trust that it had passed the necessary regulations. Others believed that everyone is implicated to some extent. The imposition of an indiscriminate cull of all cattle at 30 months old was widely seen as doing little or nothing to solve the BSE problem, and has left a widespread sense of anger and frustration. As well as removing cattle from infected herds from the food chain, it
is destroying nearly half a million perfectly good cattle, for what is perceived to be mainly an exercise in restoring consumer confidence. Even the slaughtermen feel upset about slaughtering good cattle simply for waste. The more recent selective cull of those 6 month old calves which are likely to have had similar feeding regimes as infected cattle is seen to make more sense, but to have come much too late.
Many different opinions were given as to the root causes. A particular concern was over what forces were driving the use of so much protein supplement in the feed, and whether in the long run this was good for either the cattle or the industry. Historically, it arose out of the post-war aim of self-sufficiency in food. With the subsequent downturn in agriculture, however, the pressure to maximise production output has become dominant, and has affected everyone in the business to varying degrees. It was also observed that people are apt to do silly things when their backs are to the wall, and subsidies could lead to strange choices being made. In retrospect one can see indicators which might have raised concern, but it is hard to judge in hindsight over issues which no one was looking for.
BSE represents a classic case of a situation driven by confidence in public information. There is evidently a widespread perception that the Government mishandled both the scientific data and public fears. It has also been recognised that the consumer, ethical and safety side of the agriculture ministry should be separated from its production-oriented responsibilities. Public perception of food safety has now become a key issue. The knowledge that animal products were being used in animal feed came as a revelation to many, but the concerns expressed about it may also have an element of the wisdom of hindsight, since it was not seen as a major ethical issue at the time. The revulsion at feeding an animal with the remains of others of its own species, however, reflects an ethical intuition that something of God's created order was being violated, and that we have ended up paying the price, not only in CJD sufferers but also those whose livelihoods depend on agriculture.
Part of the problem is that links between farmers and consumers have become very distant. Food has become what comes out of packages in the supermarket, not what farmers spend a life on the land to produce. In an increasingly urbanised environment, people are no longer close to the land, nor reminded daily of the connection between what they eat and the what happens in the fields around them. There is also concern that decisions that affect our food habits are far removed from the general public, made by supermarket chains, producers and Government
departments. The crisis shows what can happen if the only effective say ordinary people have is in what we choose to buy, or not, off the shelf. With all the regulatory and other measures now in place, there would appear to be no significant risk today from eating prime Scottish beef cuts, but there are concerns that wholesome meals remain available to the poorest in our society. It is said that more people may currently be dying from eating shell fish and nuts than from beef, but it is clear that into the next century the Scottish beef industry will be shaped largely by the varying moods of public risk perception. If the gulf between food production and the public remains as wide as it is, that is inevitable.
Return to Contents
There are still large uncertainties about the nature and causes of BSE, its transfer or not to other species, and the cause of the new strain of CJD. Their characteristics are well established, but their mechanisms are peculiarly intractable. There is no good test for either disease without a post-mortem. The long incubation period (5 years in cattle and 10-15 years in humans) followed by a rapid onset, makes study difficult. The
most likely explanation for BSE remains that a form of scrapie "jumped species" into cattle, by being fed in contaminated feed to cattle. Within the EU, only the UK has a high level of both sheep and cattle, to have the possibility of a high enough level of cross feeding to create an epidemic, rather than just a few cases.
The new strain of CJD with its possible link to BSE came as a complete surprise to everyone involved. Two years before, most experts would have said it was highly improbable. The theory that it was caused by eating contaminated cattle remains unproven, but a compelling piece of data is that only the UK has a BSE epidemic and only one such CJD case has since been found outside the UK. Key research is continuing. It is apparently very difficult biologically for the active agent to jump species, simply as a result of the process of eating. There is
thus some hope that CJD will not turn into an equivalent epidemic to BSE. Because of the long incubation period, however, we will not know for some years yet. Whatever its eventual magnitude, the damage has been done. Families of those who do develop CJD in future will need much support with a distressing and incurable disease, and measures also need to be taken to avoid serious harm to Scotland's upland cattle breeding and their dependent rural communities.
Perhaps just as long-lasting is the damage to the trust in how public information based on science is handled by politicians. One of the central issues to emerge is how we deal with scientific uncertainty, without causing unnecessary scares or making false assurances. This will be one of many issues to be examined in the SRT Project's new study into the ethical, theological and social implications of risks from technology.
The above report reflected the situation as it stood in late January 1997. In a brief update at the Church of Scotland's General Assembly in May, the SRT Director drew attention to the serious fall in beef prices at the Spring sales to the lowest level for 16 years. There are a variety of reasons for this, one of which is cheap foreign exports. It is having a serious effect on finishers, who for the second year running were selling finished cattle at a loss, and with the prospect that adequate compensation will not be forthcoming for 1997. This is having a knock on effect throughout the entire livestock sector in Scottish argiculture.
1. P. Cook, Head of the SAC Rural Business Unit, in the Glasgow Herald, 16 May1996.
Return to Contents
In preparing this report, the Committee on Church and Nation and the Society Religion and Technology Project between them consulted the following people and organisations, and are most grateful to them for their time and their insights :
- Dr Robert Will, Neurologist of the CJD Surveillance Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, whose team discovered the new form of CJD in March 1996.
- Dr Robert Somerville of the Neuropathology Unit of Edinburgh University, researching into spongiform diseases.
- Two public lectures in Edinburgh on the nature and possible causes of BSE by Dr Richard Kimberlin, a leading expert on scrapie, and on the epidemiology of BSE by Dr C. Donnelly of Oxford University.
- Mr Peter Cook, head of the Rural Business Unit of the Scottish Agricultural College, Thainstone, Aberdeenshire.
- Mr Sandy Cook senior and junior, farmers, Mosshead Farm, Aberdeenshire.
- Mr Ian Galloway, chairman of J.W.Galloway Ltd.
- Mr Andy MacFarlane, President of the Scottish Farmers Union for Aberdeen and Kincardine, agricultural consultant and farmer.
- Mr Brian Pack, Chief Executive Aberdeen and Northern Mart, Thainstone, Aberdeenshire.
- Mr Raymond White, Chairman of the Scottish Association of Meat Wholesalers, abattoir manager.
- Mr Sandy Wright, Executive Secretary of the Institute for Auctioneers for Scotland.
Return to Contents
Motions on BSE/CJD Passed by the General Assembly on 22 May 1997
The General Assembly of the Church of Scotland :
1. Express their concern at the long-term threat to the Scottish beef industry as a result of the BSE/CJD crisis, and call upon HMG to ensure the industry is given adequate financial and other support once the present compensation runs out.
2. Urge Her Majesty's Government to enter meaningful and constructive dialogue with out European partners so that the beef export ban can be lifted as soon as possible.
3. Express their sympathy to the friends and relatives of sufferers of the new form of CJD and urge local congregations to be aware of their special need of support.
4. Express concern to beef farmers and their families and, where appropriate, urge local local congregations to be aware of their special need for support at this difficult time.
5. Express deep regret, as stewards of God's creation, at the violation of God's created order that has led to the BSE crisis and the suffering of god's creatures, quite a apart from the possible transfer of BSE to other species.
6. Express their concern at the damage to public trust in the provision of information on food safety as a result of HMG's handling of the BSE/CJD crisis.
|
Return to Contents
About Copyright
This page has been produced by the Society Religion and Technology Project of the Church of Scotland (SRT for short), and is copyright, © Donald M.Bruce, 1996.
For a further article of these issues, see Living with Uncertainty - Risk and BSE
We'd be interested in any thoughts you might have on the above. Please email us a comment if you'd like to.
This page has been produced by the Society Religion and Technology Project of the Church of Scotland. For more about our work on other issues, see our other SRT pages, our SRT Publications List, or our On-line SRT Newsletter
If you want further information about the SRT Project, contact us at :
Dr.Donald M.Bruce,
SRT Project, , 121 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4YN, Scotland.
tel. +44 (0)131-240 2250, fax +44 (0)131-240 2239,
email srtp@srtp.org.uk
To send us an email click on :
mailto:srtp@srtp.org.uk
Return to Contents
Return to Further Information
Return to SRT Home Page
Index of SRT Project Pages
SRT Website Map
