SRT Home Page
What is the SRT Project?
Site Map & Subject Index
What's New?
Highlights
Current Talking Point
The Big Issues
SRT Publications
SRT Newsletter
SRT Information Sheets
SRT Topical Papers
Press Room

Contact SRT
Send a comment
Guest Book
SRT Trust & Associates
Links

European Christian
    Environmental Network
Eco-Congregation

Society, Religion and Technology Project

SRT Logo

Church of Scotland

Looking at the ethics of technology for a New Millennium



The Internet and Pornography

The Internet is a phenomenon which has burst into public awareness in dramatic fashion over the last 18 months. It has been the subject of much hype in the media, yet there is little doubt that it is one of the most significant technological developments of recent years. It makes more readily available the vast range of human written and graphical information than has ever been possible. It provides many new opportunities for the church, which are explored in a parallel report of the Board of Communications. The Society, Religion and Technology Project is producing "John Knox's Guide to the Internet" to explain in simple terms what it is all about and how to get connected, and also to comment on some of the new questions it poses. The Internet also gives a new focus to some familiar issues, such as pornography and censorship. This report looks briefly at this area, in response to a request at the 1995 General Assembly.

Features of the Internet

What makes the Internet special is a combination of six features - speed, the ease and breadth of access to information, indiscriminacy, uncontrollability, individuality and anonymity. Simply by joining up computers, any recordable information that can be reduced electronically - script, images, sounds and video - can be sent rapidly to and from anywhere in the world. In essence it is basically very simple to use, so that, potentially, anyone has ready access to a range of information unparalleled in the history of communication. The main limits are having a computer and modem in the first place, and one's curiosity, time and phone bill.

The Internet is indiscriminate : while information is being sent, it is simply so many bits of data. Thus anyone with access to the Internet can put anything they like on it. This also means there is no way to stop it, and no one in a position to control it. Its very nature transcends national boundaries and the normal means of control exercised by a society. It is individual and anonymous. The individual "surfer" on the Net can flit from one site to another, view what they want, then move on silently and anonymously, never interacting humanly, an extreme case of individual consumerism. There is no one to watch where anyone goes, and this can have many advantages, but it can also open up a whole world of temptation. This includes children, who are not only naturally more curious to know "what happens if...?" , but are often far more au fait with the Internet, its techniques and tricks than their parents.

Access to Pornography

The range of pornographic material far exceeds anything ever before, and there is no one to see you, as it were, reaching up to the top shelf to have a peep. Reliable statistics are difficult to come by, but the regular sampling of the most "visited" categories of site on the World Wide Web by "Internet" magazine suggests that visits to "adult" Websites vastly exceed all other categories. Much of this information has always been theoretically available, but in practice was inaccessible outside a relatively narrow slice of the population who knew where to find it. Via the Internet, anyone can find readily enough pornographic material of every imaginable and unimaginable kind.

The Internet reveals more readily and indiscriminately, and to more people, more of what goes on in human society, than perhaps any form of communication yet devised. This indiscriminate opening up of "all human life" brings areas to light that are normally hidden, brings some questions to light which have been far from most people's thoughts or experience. Should some controls be applied? There is much debate and effort going on into whether it should be possible to introduce some sort of control to restrict the access of pornographic and certain other material, especially into the home. The subject is both technically difficult and highly controversial.

Possible Controls

It is probably impossible to monitor, let alone censor, what is being transmitted. The Internet is not a physical system but millions of links between computers. No one controls it, because there isn't an "it" to control. There is no probably no reliable way of distinguishing technically between a pornographic image, fine art or a family photo on the beach. The information travels far too fast and far too tiny bits for anyone to know what is being sent until it has arrived and been "decoded".

At an individual level, it is possible to do a first level of control of access to this type of material, but it is not foolproof. It is possible to choose a "service provider" (an organisation via whose computer individuals are connected to the Internet) which refuses to give its subscribers access to certain sites and groups, or to have them located on its computer. Some make a point of it in their advertising, but only some would offer this. To effect a more general ban would require national (and probably global) legislation, and ways would inevitably be found around it. The more obvious "banned" sites and newsgroups would disappear beneath another level of encryption, move to a site with a less obvious name, or communicate taboo words by using euphemisms.

It is also possible to buy one of a growing number of programmes which will filter out the more obvious sites, such as the alt.sex series. These typically use an updateable blacklist of such sites and newsgroups, defined by categories or certain keywords. Within a family, these can provide another "line of defence", but they are not proof against competent young hackers or someone whose parents didn't bother. It also raises the question of abrogating parental responsibilities to "technological fixes". It is one thing for parents who are already keeping in touch with what their children are watching, to have such a piece of software to send a clear message of the standards of behaviour expected for the whole family. The temptation is to use it as a substitute for the much trickier task of educating a child on what the world is like, what people are like and what sort of personal standards are good ones to live by.

Should we seek to Control?

The notion of general censorship is highly controversial because there is widespread cultural opposition across the Net to any sort of policing or control. Its entire evolved ethos is the free passage of any information, safe from interference by Government, police, commercial or political interests, or simply by "busybodies". This freedom is staunchly defended. For many it is a very expression of the alternative, virtual community which the Net provides, whose values are almost archetypally post-modern. No overarching world view holds sway, everyone is free to express on the Net the values they feel. The Net's own code of conduct is that if you don't like something, then you have the choice not to look at it, but do not have the right to impose your standards on it by objecting to its existence. "You do your thing and let me do mine." A Christian message offering help was posted to a newsgroup known to be a cover for the exchange of child pornography. It was greeted with several highly abusive responses, telling the author sharply to get his nose out of their area and stick to religious groups. The church would do well to recognise that for many people, such actions will be interpreted as an attempt to exert power over them.

The future of the Internet depends on the discipline and imagination brought to bear in the use of this remarkable technological development. The danger is to let its potential dictate terms to us, instead of the other way round, or to respond in an exaggerated and high handed way. Christians should welcome this new development, but see it in its place and not beyond it. Some are already working to give positive alternatives to the things that others will undoubtedly find to do with it. By the exercise of our imagination, of developing and sharing the things about life and living which we as Christians believe are of eternal value, we can be an influence for better things. If we do not, the agenda will be set entirely by the rest of the world. We who see value in wisdom and understanding more than mere information, and in relationships of self-giving love than mere individual experiences, have something to say.

Go to SRT Internet Ethics Pages


For Further Information

We'd also welcome any comments you may have. We don't claim to have said the last word!
If you want to send us a comment, or obtain further information, or receive our latest Newsletter,

email us at :
mailto:srtp@srtp.org.uk

or send an ordinary letter or fax to :

Dr.Donald M.Bruce,
SRT Project, , 121 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4YN, Scotland.
tel. +44 (0)131-240 2250, fax +44 (0)131-240 2239,
email srtp@srtp.org.uk

About Copyright

This page has been produced by the Society Religion and Technology Project of the Church of Scotland (SRT for short), and is copyright, Donald M.Bruce, 1996. We're usually happy for people to reproduce all or part of our articles, but please write or email us for permission first, at our address below.

Return to Contents

This page was last revised on 4 January 1999 in content and in March 2006 in layout.


Back to Top of Page
Go to SRT Internet Ethics Pages
Go to SRT Website Map
Go to SRT Contents Page
Return to SRT Home Page