Scifest Scifest

Society Religion and Technology Project

at the 2000



Edinburgh International Science Festival

... the world's largest Science Festival



PRESS RELEASE - EDINBURGH INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE FESTIVAL

What Do We Mean by Precaution?

Saturday 15 April, 5.15 – 7.00 p.m.

Royal Museum of Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh

Risk is all the rage, whether it's escaping genes, rail crashes or mobile phones. Precaution has become a buzz word, on the lips of scientists, environmentalists and politicians. And it seems to mean, as Humpty Dumpty said, whatever your want it to mean - or whatever serves your agenda. But what does precaution really mean? Three experts debate what has become the central issue in today's preoccupation with risk, and ask what we should ... or shouldn't do ... with technology.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Professor John Adams, Professor of Geography, University College London,

author of the widely acclaimed book "Risk"

Robin Grove-White, Director of the Centre for Environmental Change, Lancaster University

leading edge social scientist on GM food and other environmental issues

Dr Robin Foster, Health & Safety Executive, Risk Policy Unit

senior analyst for the Government's regulatory authority on risk and safety

Chaired by : Dr Donald Bruce, Society, Religion and Technology Project Director

ex-Nuclear Inspectorate risk analyst, now leads Church of Scotland unit on technology & ethics

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The debate will unravel what is really meant by the Precautionary Principle :

Is it a useful way to evaluate uncertainties where we haven't enough data yet, like climate change?
Is it, as many Americans say, an over-reaction to emotional fears about technology?
Or does it mean refraining, if we can postulate even the slightest chance of a risk?

We'll ask who bears the burden of proof before we can go ahead with a technology like GM crops?

Is it for the biotechnologist to prove a postulated risk is not significant, ;
or for the environmentalist to prove that the postulated hazard is indeed real?

We will explore these questions in the light of some current controversies about technology - like GM foods, mobile phones and transport accidents. We'll also look at our own none too rational behaviour - like getting alarmed at some rather remote risks with GM food and yet driving a car at 70 mph when we're tired or had too much to drink. And why do we like scary fairground rides?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John Adams says we have a "risk thermostat" which inclines us to want a certain level of risk in our lives, so we readjust our behaviour accordingly. But we have a problem over virtual risks, like BSE or climate change where science is inconclusive, and rely more on social and personal factors.

Robin Grove-White argues that all our risk judgements are value driven. Precaution is a public reaction to the presumption that scientific ways of describing and evaluating a risk are "the facts". We need to develop a new politics of public negotiation and decision for new technologies.

Robin Foster looks at the unenviable role of the regulator, who has to decide when to err on the side of caution, and how much. Regulations and controls can reduce risks to broadly acceptable levels, but novel science often leaves a residual risk. Precaution is invoked where this could have big or irreversible consequences, even if the risk is very remote, or when societal concern is high. Yet precaution is only one factor. It must also be proportional and consistent with other risks.

Donald Bruce says risk is not a pest we should try and eliminate, but part of learning to be human - and mortal - in God's risky universe. Even precaution has its limits.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Organised by the Society, Religion and Technology Project of the Church of Scotland

Further details from SRT Project, srtp@srtp.org.uk
tel. 0131-240 2250, fax 0131-240 2239

or Church of Scotland Press Office 0131- 240 2243


Back to SRT Science Festival Pages
Back to SRT Press Room
Go to SRT's Risk Pages
Back to SRT Project Home Page
Go to SRT Website Contents Page
Back to Edinburgh International Science Festival